THE
RIAA TOOK MY BABY AWAY
So,
have you been sued by the RIAA yet? Chances are, you haven't,
even if you're the most uploadin' downloadin' sideloadin'
outlaw this side of the Pecos. That's because the RIAA (Recording
Industry Association of America) is basically suing old people
and children who don't know how to protect themselves online.
So why is the RIAA targeting these everyday folks? To scare
all of us str8...To raise the fists of fury over our psyches
in hopes that it'll be enough to create a shadow of doubt
in our minds the next time we fire up the latest BitTorrent
client...To send us scurrying into the arms of Steve Job's
I-tunes monarchy. Ahhh, the land of I.
The
big question is, has it worked? Has the strong arm of the
RIAA legal team made a difference? Or, even better, what if
every time there were a technological advancement, the entrenched
industries sued their customers to try and force them to remain
customers?
For
example, let's examine the powdered wig market (not to be
confused with the powdered WHIG market). What if powdered
wig makers used the same tactics when their product was sliding
into oblivion?
Powdered
wigs became very fashionable around 1715-1720, and ruled the
fashion roost until 1800 or so. That's 85 years of industrial
dominance, only a little shorter than the 100 year lifespan
of recorded music in this country. Around 1795, young men
took to powdering their own hair instead of buying powdered
wigs, essentially undermining the wig industry!!! But wait!
What if a high-powered legal team had stepped in? In 1795,
you might have received a messenger-dispatched letter much
like this:
Dear
___________,
We
are counsel to a group of companies that intend to file a
lawsuit against you shortly for copyright infringement. Our
clients include the following wig companies and their labels
and subsidiaries: Mssrs. Interscope, Atlantic, Motown, Electra,
Sony, Arista, and the Brothers Warner. We have gathered substantial
evidence that you have been using your own powder and have
borrowed the powder of others to copy the style of our clients'
latest wig fashions without actually purchasing their wigs.
We are writing in advance of filing suit against you in the
event that you have interest in resolving these claims through
settlement.
The
wig companies take copyright infringement very seriously,
and for good reason. Copyright theft is not a victimless crime.
People spend countless hours working hard to create wig designs
- not just the designers themselves, but also hair vendors
(horse and human), weavers, and even wig head manufacturers.
In addition the wig industry employs thousands of other people
such as wig store clerks, warehouse personnel, and developers
of legitimate hair fashions. They all depend on the sale of
wigs to earn a living. So do wig companies, which routinely
invest millions of dollars to discover and sign promising
wig artists, and then to produce and market their wigs. In
addition, piracy eats away at the investment dollars available
to fund new wigs and, in effect, erodes the future of hairstyles.
That means that a creatively gifted, but commercially risky,
wig designer may not get signed. A talented wig maker may
be forced to make wig making a hobby instead of a career.
In the end, the hairstyles suffer, along with everyone who
cares about their appearance - from the people who make the
wigs to the consumers who enjoy them.
Although
we want you to appreciate the harm that piracy causes, the
purpose of this notice is to provide you with the opportunity
to resolve this matter and avoid being sued. In deciding whether
you wish to discuss settlement, here are some things we believe
you should consider:
-Making
copyrighted wig designs available for others to emulate using
powders and their own hair is copyright infringement under
the Copyright Act, as is the unauthorized manufacture and
distribution of said powders. Ignorance of the law is no defense.
What that means is that it does not matter whether you knew
it was illegal. Whether or not you intend to infringe does
not matter. If you violate the wig companies' copyrights you
will be held liable for damages as a result.
-The
copyright Act imposes a range of statutory damages for copyright
infringement. The minimum damages under the law is $750 for
each copyrighted wig design that has been infringed ("shared").
If a court determines you acted "willfully", the
maximum damage award can be even more. In addition to damages,
you may also be responsible for paying the legal fees we incur
in order to pursue their claims, and are subject to having
an injunction entered against you prohibiting from further
infringing activity.
-If
you choose not to settle the case, you must file a response
to the complaint within 20 days of being served. Failure to
respond to the complaint can result in a default judgment
being entered against you. That default will include the entry
of a monetary judgment and an injunction.
-Now
that you are aware that a lawsuit may be filed against you,
there is an obligation for you to preserve evidence that relates
to the claims against you. In this case, that means, at minimum,
the entire library of wig designs that you have made available
for distribution need to be maintained as evidence. The evidence
necessary for the wig companies to prevail in this action
has already been secured. Nevertheless, any destruction of
evidence would be a serious matter.
If
you have an interest in pursuing settlement discussions to
avoid litigation or have other concerns you wold like to discuss,
you or your attorney may contact us via town crier or messenger
at 14 Hawthorne Street, Philadelphia, PA. If you are under
18, your attorney (or your parent or other guardian) must
be present during any discussions. We will assume that you
are not interested in settlement and proceed to litigation
if we do not hear from you within ten (10) calendar days from
the date of this letter.
We
encourage you to consult with an attorney immediately to advise
you on your rights and responsibilities, since we are obviously
not your lawyers.
Sincerely,
Patricia B. Arnold
of
Mitchellson, Silberberger, and Pupp LLP
By the way, all of the text of this ridiculous message, except
for the references to wigs and powder, comes straight from
the letter the RIAA sends out to people it thinks it can blackmail
into settling. I wonder if they'll sue me for satirizing the
letter. We'll see.
-Tom
Click the link below for some good-ass info:
Electronic
Frontier Foundation - How Not to Get Sued by the RIAA for
File Sharing
Click
Here for Previous Installments:
LA
Driving Tips
Comic
Con Dreams